The History of England, from the Accession of James II — Volume 2
Tekst637 (return)
[ Clarendon's Diary, Dee. 24 1688; Burnet, i. 819.; Proposals humbly offered in behalf of the Princess of Orange, Jan. 28. 1688/9.]
638 (return)
[ Burnet, i. 389., and the notes of Speaker Onslow.]
639 (return)
[ Evelyn's Diary, Sept. 26. 1672, Oct. 12. 1679, July 13. 1700; Seymour's Survey of London.]
640 (return)
[ Burnet, i. 388.; and Speaker Onslow's note.]
641 (return)
[ Citters, Jan 22/Feb 1 1689; Grey's Debates.]
642 (return)
[ Lords' and Commons' Journals, Jan. 22. 1688; Citters and Clarendon's Diary of the same date.]
643 (return)
[ Lords' Journals, Jan. 25. 1683; Clarendon's Diary, Jan. 23. 25.]
644 (return)
[ Commons' Journals, Jan. 28. 1688/9; Grey's Debates, Citters Jan 29/Feb 8 If the report in Grey's Debates be correct, Citters must have been misinformed as to Sawyer's speech.]
645 (return)
[ Lords' and Commons' Journals, Jan. 29. 1688/9]
646 (return)
[ Clarendon's Diary, Jan. 21. 1688/9; Burnet, i. 810; Doyly's Life of Sancroft;]
647 (return)
[ See the Act of Uniformity.]
648 (return)
[ Stat. 2 Hen. 7. c. I.: Lord Coke's Institutes, part iii. chap i.; Trial of Cook for high treason, in the Collection of State Trials; Burnet, i. 873. and Swift's note.]
649 (return)
[ Lords Journals Jan. 29. 1688/9; Clarendon's Diary; Evelyn's Diary; Citters; Eachard's History of the Revolution; Barnet, i. 813.; History of the Reestablishment of the Government, 1689. The numbers of the Contents and Not Contents are not given in the journals, and are differently reported by different writers. I have followed Clarendon, who took the trouble to make out lists of the majority and minority.]
650 (return)
[ Grey's Debates; Evelyn's Diary; Life of Archbishop Sharp, by his son; Apology for the New Separation, in a letter to Dr. John Sharp, Archbishop of York, 1691.]
651 (return)
[ Lords' Journals, Jan. 30. 1689/8; Clarendon's Diary.]
652 (return)
[ Dartmouth's note on Burnet i. 393. Dartmouth says that it was from Fagel that the Lords extracted the hint. This was a slip of the pen very pardonable in a hasty marginal note; but Dalrymple and others ought not to have copied so palpable a blunder. Fagel died in Holland, on the 5th of December 1688, when William was at Salisbury and James at Whitehall. The real person was, I suppose, Dykvelt, Bentinck, or Zulestein, most probably Dykvelt.]
653 (return)
[ Both the service and Burnet's sermon are still to be found in our great libraries, and will repay the trouble of perusal.]
654 (return)
[ Lords' Journals, Jan. 31. 1688/9.]
655 (return)
[ Citters, Feb. 5/15. 1689; Clarendon's Diary, Feb. 2. The story is greatly exaggerated in the work entitled Revolution Politics, an eminently absurd book, yet of some value as a record of the foolish reports of the day. Greys Debates.]
656 (return)
[ The letter of James, dated Jan 24/Feb 3 1689, will be found in Kennet. It is most disingenuously garbled in Clarke's Life of James. See Clarendon's Diary, Feb. 2. 4.; Grey's Debates; Lords' Journals, Feb. 2. 4. 1688/9.]
657 (return)
[ It has been asserted by several writers, and, among others, by Ralph and by M. Mazure, that Danby signed this protest. This is a mistake. Probably some person who examined the journals before they were printed mistook Derby for Danby. Lords' Journals, Feb. 4. 1688/9. Evelyn, a few days before, wrote Derby, by mistake, for Danby. Diary, Jan. 29. 1688/9]
658 (return)
[ Commons' Journals, Feb. 5. 1688/9]
659 (return)
[ Burnet, i. 819.]
660 (return)
[ Clarendon's Diary, Jan. 1, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 1688/9; Burnet, i. 807.]
661 (return)
[ Clarendon's Diary, Feb, 5. 168/9; Duchess of Marlborough's Vindication; Mulgrave's Account of the Revolution.]
662 (return)
[ Burnet, i. 820. Burnet says that he has not related the events of this stirring time in chronological order. I have therefore been forced to arrange them by guess: but I think that I can scarcely be wrong in supposing that the letter of the Princess of Orange to Danby arrived, and that the Prince's explanation of his views was given, between Thursday the 31st of January, and Wednesday the 6th of February.]
663 (return)
[ Mulgrave's Account of the Revolution. In the first three editions, I told this story incorrectly. The fault was chiefly my own but partly Burnet's, by whose careless use of the pronoun he, I was misled. Burnet, i. 818]
664 (return)
[ Commons' Journals, Feb. 6. 1688/9]
665 (return)
[ See the Lords' and Commons' Journals of Feb. 6. 1688/9 and the Report of the Conference.]
666 (return)
[ Lords' Journals, Feb. 6. 1688/9; Clarendon's Diary; Burnet, i. 822. and Dartmouth's note; Citters, Feb. 8/18,. I have followed Clarendon as to the numbers. Some writers make the majority smaller and some larger.]
667 (return)
[ Lords Journals, Feb. 6, 7. 1688/9; Clarendon's Diary.]
668 (return)
[ Commons Journals, Jan. 29., Feb. 2. 1688/9.]
669 (return)
[ Commons' Journal's, Feb, 2. 1683.]
670 (return)
[ Grey's Debates; Burnet, i. 822.]
671 (return)
[ Commons' Journals, Feb. 4. 8. 11, 12.; Lords' Journals, Feb. 9. 11. 12, 1688/9]
672 (return)
[ London Gazette, Feb. 14. 1688/9; Citters, Feb. 12/22.]
673 (return)
[ Duchess of Marlborough's Vindication; Review of the Vindication; Burnet, i. 781. 825. and Dartmouth's note; Evelyn's Diary, Feb. 21. 1688/9.]
674 (return)
[ Lords' and Commons' Journals, Feb. 14 1688/9; Citters, Feb. 15/25. Citters puts into William's mouth stronger expressions of respect for the authority of Parliament than appear in the journals; but it is clear from what Powle said that the report in the journals was not strictly accurate.]
675 (return)
[ London Gazette, Feb. 14. 1688/9; Lords' and Commons' Journals, Feb. 13.; Citters, Feb 15/25; Evelyn, Feb. 21.]